Week 3: Thoughts on Virtual Learning Community Chapters
I can relate to “community” as a metaphor for an online learning group, as Schwier proposes, as a group of people bound together to learn. I’ve seen learning communities evolve online among geographically-dispersed professionals who start to share articles, perspectives and resources that enable them to learn from each other and literally change the way each person works. I have online “relationships” with colleagues in Alabama, Minnesota, and Ohio whom I have never met and probably never will. But despite not really knowing each other, we share learning and informally point each other in new directions to learn more. We are bound together loosely but use each other to enhance our own learning.
I can relate to “community” as a metaphor for an online learning group, as Schwier proposes, as a group of people bound together to learn. I’ve seen learning communities evolve online among geographically-dispersed professionals who start to share articles, perspectives and resources that enable them to learn from each other and literally change the way each person works. I have online “relationships” with colleagues in Alabama, Minnesota, and Ohio whom I have never met and probably never will. But despite not really knowing each other, we share learning and informally point each other in new directions to learn more. We are bound together loosely but use each other to enhance our own learning.
I also like Schwier’s sense that learning communities are
everywhere we look. They aren’t
all online; they can be book clubs, fishing groups, quilting bees and survivor
support groups. They are all
communities of interest and provide informal learning opportunities. They
offer social connections and often rich learning through social engagement (and
Schwier reminds us, intimidation through social engagement, sometimes). But technology can bring together
learners who would not have connected through any other means. New online collaborators offer
different perspectives and an opportunity to access new information and
ideas.
But the jury is still out on participation in communities or
online environments, as Schwier also calls them. In fact, he asks whether online environments promote social
engagement or social isolation before pointing to research from Canada that
online networking can increase participation in communities and social
organizations. He concludes that
online learning communities may be engaging and/or isolating, depending on the participants and
their agendas. In the end, technology, as we all know, has advantages and
disadvantages, but also presents new opportunities in connecting and
learning.
I liked the connection you made to communities that are not online. If you think about communities as gatherings or groups that form with a common interest then communities have been around for ages. This is how people would learn better techniques or share ideas back before the internet. I think of book groups that take place within schools and libraries and imagine what kind of response to a book you could get by joining an online book group. This would definitely give you a different perspective on the book if you were talking to someone on the west coast or even a different country. This gets me thinking about the reading class I teach and I think I want to find another school online that is reading the same book we are to have discussions to help students think about how to discuss a book with other people outside of their school. This would also motivate them to read more so they can talk with the other school.
ReplyDelete